Listen to the full episode.
What this episode examines
Your 5G service level agreement is not a safety case, and confusing the two is a dangerous mistake for the future of rail.
In this episode, we break down why FRMCS cannot depend on the goodwill of a mobile operator, regardless of how low the latency claims are. We explore the logic of EN 50159 and explain why the only way to build a truly resilient railway architecture is to assume the network is already hostile, degraded, or failing.
Understanding this distinction is the difference between a system that works on paper and one that actually keeps passengers safe when the transport layer inevitably breaks.
Subscribe to the show and share this episode with an engineer who needs a reality check on 5G.
Read the technical analysis
The companion Analysis develops the sourced technical argument, trust boundary and operational decision in a durable written reference.
Related analysisFRMCS Should Treat the Mobile Network as Transport, Not as TrustRead analysis →